Performance Company Spring 2008 Show Summary
Image via WikipediaAll right, the "hell week" is over. Three audiences have seen the show, and today marks the start of Memorial Day weekend. There will be no show tonight; we moved our schedule up a day to account for Memorial Day weekend. But it was still three shows.
And a memorable three shows they have been. From George's early pants removal at the beginning of the first night's show to skipping half a scene the second night (something from the last night would have been better, but I couldn't think of one), we've had our share of mix-ups and mistakes. Fortunately, many of them actually made the show funnier.
Lots can happen in two hours, and this show was very near that total. The beat sheets backstage had a list of eleven scenes and songs, some long enough to be shows in and of themselves. But we combined them all together. We even faked an intermission during entry #8, "Intermission Song". But there wasn't really an intermission; it was all a practical joke.
The full program went like this:
- The Actor's Nightmare (scene) *
- BusyBusyBusy (song) *
- DMV Tyrant (scene)
- Belly Button (song) *
- Canker Sores and Other Distractions (scene) *
- On the train (dance) *
- Funeral Parlor (scene) *
- Intermission Song (song, duh) *
- Under Duress (scene)
- Nobody Understands Me (song)
- Medea (scene, not the full play) *
See, the entire show was composed of scenes ("short plays") by Christopher Durang (a Tony and Obie award winning playwright) and songs by the Philadelphia Chickens (On the train was choreographed by our, er, choreographer). Every item is funny, each in its own way. There was a good mix of all kinds of humor, from political commentary to slapstick and just plain weird stuff.
By the way, items with an * are the ones I took part in. Just thought that would be useful. As you can see, most of the list is items with *s. I was very busy.
The Acts
I'll summarize each thing here, just to give those who didn't see the show -- probably a lot of you -- an idea of what went down. (I'm thinking about asking my dad to edit and digitize the videos so I can upload them. More on that at a later date.)
The Actor's Nightmare
George Spelvin, an accountant, wanders into a theater just before a performance, and is told he has to go on for one of the lead actors (who has been in a car accident and broken both legs, taking the traditional good-luck wish a bit too far). But the situations he faces quickly get out of hand. Is it a dream or is it reality? Who knows?
BusyBusyBusy
This song is just pure funny. There's even a cellphone involved. I should know, I was part of that bit.
DMV Tyrant
James Agnes, a permit-holding student who has just taken and passed the driver's test, wants to get his (yes, his) license, but the counter clerk is none too cooperative when it turns out that neither James nor his test score is in the computer.
Belly Button
I performed a part of this song, and I still don't know what the point is. I think it's just supposed to be weird.
Canker Sores and Other Distractions
Martin and Prunella, a divorced couple in their middle age, meet by chance after ten years and are swept off their feet into love, but their choice of restaurant leaves much to be desired. The other painful afflictions don't help matters.
On the train
This is just set-up for the funeral parlor scene.
Funeral Parlor
A very strange woman whose father won't even return her phone calls any more shows up at the funeral. Very. Strange. Woman.
Intermission Song
Comic relief, and a practical joke on the audience.
Under Duress
Someone is unhappy with the way the President is running things, and decides to make her views on global warming heard.
Nobody Understands Me
Pure jazz.
Medea
Not your ordinary Greek tragedy. It's also supposed to be The Trojan Women.
The Glitches
As with any show, things don't always go according to plan. Each night had its own share of little hiccups. I've listed all the ones I noticed here.
The Actor's Nightmare
First night: George (Stanley?) drops his pants way too early, prompting a hilarious bit of cover-up (which was really fun to come up with: "Look, nobody's allowed backstage before a performance -- especially people without pants on -- so you'll have to leave..." Great fun!); part of one of George's lines is dropped in the Hamlet section; the executioner messes up kicking the cutting block over and has to try again; the entire Man for All Seasons section is totally whacked.
Second night: Tiny flub during the Hamlet section (not sure who messed up, though); Man for All Seasons part whacked again, even after multiple run-throughs before the show.
Third night: Very small line flubs and a slight mix-up in the final scene.
BusyBusyBusy
First night: Umm... It went quite well, given that it was nearly cut the day before.
Second night: The cellphone bit ended up being a bit crackly due to the transmitting end having to be relocated on account of noisy ballet dancers from the show next door (this one was most likely my fault, folks).
Third night: Great!
DMV Tyrant
I couldn't find anything wrong with this one, except that the clerk was a bit hard to hear the first two nights.
Belly Button
Failure FAIL (can there be such a thing?). Meaning nothing.
Canker Sores and Other Distractions
First night: Midge took a little long coming back a couple times, forcing a bit of ad lib.
Second night: It went pretty well; nothing comes to mind.
Third night: I definitely paraphrased a line somewhere in there... But it was a good rendition nonetheless. Which was great because I had people actually there that night.
On the train
First night: Quite well, just not always together.
Second night: Better. The downstage boundary of the train apparently moved somewhere between stage right and stage left. One or two people were too far downstage.
Third night: Very good, but there was one outlying cast member stage left. Too far downstage, again. Oh well.
Funeral Parlor
First night: Almost all the extras (everyone but me) left, and way too early at that. Only some of them are supposed to go, and not till much further into the scene.
Second night: A large section of dialogue was dropped, including the cue line for extras to start leaving to go change for their next role (the cows in the Intermission Song) and the first bit of keening by Marion. Oh, and the set was missing (a few chairs).
Third night: The best run!
Intermission Song
First night: I didn't notice anything.
Second night: Nobody fell for it! Rats.
Third night: Almost got 'em, but my triangle finger was too itchy. People were this close to getting up when I rang it.
Under Duress
Worked for me...
Nobody Understands Me
First night: Flawless. (No, that's not a problem; it's another way of saying I couldn't find anything wrong with it.) We were just missing the bass part, because it turned out the notes in it were wrong.
Second night: Very good, and we even got our bass part back (because the director figured out the right notes before the show).
Third night: I think the best one of the three nights.
Medea
First night: I flubbed a couple of the chorus lines, because I lost my script a month ago in Chicago.
Second night: It went much better. But nobody brought the boxes for the chorus (needed because the other three members are so much shorter than I am
.
Third night: Boxes were planned better and we all knew what we were saying. Completely.
Conclusion
So obviously we had our share of flubs. But the great thing is, the audience hardly noticed a thing! And that's the magic of theater.
One interesting little tidbit came this morning, at the end of a rehearsal for another show with the same theater school. The principal of the location I attend (the only one with a Further Stages™ program) was trying to inspire the cast of that show, Working, after an abbreviated run-through. After giving her notes, she made a short speech about the Performance Company's show.
She called it the most phenomenal show she'd ever seen at the school.
That blew me away. I guess it was better than I thought.
Since we have a tape of the second and third nights, and the third night was (I think) the best, I'm considering doing a showing for the people who didn't get to come (most of the Working cast). Also, an upload to the Internet (for family and friends who are out-of-state and/or couldn't make it) is on my mind. I'll see about getting the tape captured and encoded sometime next month. I'm really low on hard disk space, so it's going to have to go on someone else's computer.
Now I get to study for the next show. Which is next week. At the same time, in the same place. So I've now been to the same theater room on seven of the last eight days. And we're using the same sound system for Working. But that's all part of being in multiple groups within the same theater school.
An Engineer’s Guide to Cats (Plus a Brief Explanation for Missing Yesterday)
Yes, I know I missed yesterday. I went to a social gathering for Passover (here, I'll give the English version -- not that I know Hebrew anyway, yet
that went a lot later than I had expected. Not only did I miss blogging, but I also missed homework, which is arguably (ha-HA!) more important than this site. Daily posting is more difficult when my already crowded computing (and real-life) schedule becomes even more crowded with one-off events. Hopefully I can get a bunch written tomorrow so this place won't go dead over the weekend when I'm away. On to the relatively short post now, with one minute to spare...
I saw this video shared on FriendFeed (in a rather roundabout way) a while ago, and I'm pretty sure most of the people who read my blog probably don't even have accounts over there. With that in mind, I thought this one was so amusing and well-done it had to be blogged. The clip is titled "An Engineer's Guide to Cats"; before I commentate and ruin the whole thing, just watch it:
For some reason I just find that to be really amusing. I'm not an engineer by any definition of the word, but I do find myself occasionally being very analytical. That's exactly what these guys did for the video.
Sorry I can't offer more of an opinion, but it's late and I have to be up really early tomorrow. And I still have a bunch of stuff to do. Blogging is going to have to be moved down a notch in priority for a little while, unfortunately.
The Evolution of Dance
I didn't have time to write a post this morning, so I'll do it now, in the afternoon. Better late than never... Not that this one would draw major traffic anyway, no matter when it's posted.
All right, it's the weekend. I don't really have anything new to report -- well, nothing that I find exciting, at any rate. A lot of things have happened this week, to be sure, but none of the events really caught my attention beyond the usual read-it-star-it-share-it-move-on in Google Reader (or the read-it-close-it-Like-it-keep-going in FriendFeed).
So I thought I'd take advantage of this uninteresting period to dig through my YouTube favorites and pull out a couple entertaining videos I've seen over the last several months. One came from a recommendation (I think) -- that's today's -- and the other was posted on FriendFeed a while back. The one I saw on FriendFeed will be tomorrow's post if nothing interesting comes up.
On to the video. You've probably seen it by now. It's the #1 most viewed video on YouTube, having been watched nearly (as I write this) 85,000,000 times. I present Judson Laipply's "Evolution of Dance":
It's a six-minute clip, as can be seen by the counter in YouTube's player. The dimensions are 425px by 355px... Oh, who am I kidding? This isn't a scientific analysis; this is commentary!
I only saw this after it had become immensely popular. Always behind on memes, I am. Such is my nature.
The video was amusing to me then, and it still is. As I recall I was babysitting my two-year-old nephew the day I discovered it. YouTube makes a great time-waster for those periods of an hour or two when I would get the job of entertaining him. That was just one of the videos we watched that day, but I think it was my favorite.
Most of the songs are familiar to me, in melody. A few are obscure, and there are several for which I don't even know the artist -- but for the most part, they're known. The dance moves are also mostly familiar.
So, hope this made a good diversion. I'm trying to save some ideas for scheduled posts that I can set up for next weekend, when I'll be out of town (in Chicago, on an orchestra trip). More on that next week, probably Wednesday or Thursday morning.
If you've watched this video again and again, and now hate the guts of anyone who shows it to you one more time, I sincerely hope you'll forgive me. I've avoided posting the Numa Numa Dance because I know everyone's really tired of it, but this one doesn't seem to have become quite as large a phenomenon. At the very least, nobody rolls their eyes when it's mentioned (that I've spoken with). And at least some thought went into this video...
My Take on April Fools’ Day
So the last couple days have been full of lots of jokes and pranks, at least in the technology world. Google pulled several, including a Gmail hoax I actually found amusing, and a slew of other sites posted their own jokes.
Notice that I didn't pull any pranks of my own. The reasoning for that is twofold. First, I didn't really have any good ideas. Second, the whole boatload of other pranks out there requires that some bloggers stick to their usual routine.
You see, I view April Fools' Day as just another day. There is a bit of annoyance when people make jokes that aren't easily distinguishable as such. The date, April 1, when applied to anything written online, means you should take what you're reading with a large grain of salt. Chances are it's a joke.
Fortunately, most (if not all) Internet big-timers are back to their usual business by now. That means I can turn on my feed-reading eyes for real and not worry about being hoodwinked. Maybe.
Actually, the one day of joking around is kind of fun. I saw some pretty cool pranks (Matt Cutts was right up there with his iPhone-plugs-into-anything hoax). The real irritation came from the fact that all this started on March 31. April Fools' Day has gotten too big for one day, apparently. Now it's two days. That's twice the amount of time one must go not being able to trust anything one reads online.
So to summarize, I like April Fools' Day pranks in moderation, when they're confined to the actual Day. And a prompt admission right after the fact couldn't hurt.
Incidentally, since the Day started a day early, the Google Gears API Blog seemed to feel it necessary to post that no, the announcements about Google Docs getting offline access were not an elaborate hoax complete with video. That's what you get for announcing something near the day your company is known for, eh? That in and of itself was funny, and scary at the same time. Google Blogoscoped included the Google Docs offline announcement on a list of April Fools' Day pranks, which scared the heck out of me when I read it before I remembered that it had been announced before the Day and had already been covered by several reputable news outlets. Fortunately my confidence was well-placed. I might have had to alter my own coverage to add a note that it was a big joke from Google...
Gmail April Fools’ 2008: "Custom Time"
So when my Internet connection decided to finally come back up this morning after a four-hour outage, I loaded Gmail to find a link reading "New! Gmail Custom Time" in my account. After reading the linked page, I instantly knew it was Google's 2008 April Fools' Day joke for Gmail.
First, take the heading: "Introducing Gmail Custom Time™: Be on time. Every time.*" (The asterisk refers to a note at the bottom of the page that "Every time" is used to loosely represent the number 10; see the page for more explanation.)
The instructions give it away even more:
Just click "Set custom time" from the Compose view. Any email you send to the past appears in the proper chronological order in your recipient's inbox. You can opt for it to show up read or unread by selecting the appropriate option.
I've messed with message times by changing my computer clock in the past, but that was back when I still used a desktop client. This kind of feature joke is what makes me love Google. Last year's Gmail Paper hoax was equally amusing.
While I'm at it, how about a look at the screenshot Google posted? It's definitely not present in my version of the application... (That was a sure-fire way to confirm the hoax, because the new feature links only appear after a complete roll-out.)
Another problem here is that the recipient might not use Gmail, in which case how does Google control the status of the email once it arrives in their inbox? Yeah, that's what I thought.
I have one more thing to gripe about: It makes my user bar into two lines! The link text is so long it causes an unintended line break:
I know it's my "low" (1024x768) screen resolution. I can just hear everyone saying, "Go widescreen already, dude!" Well, I have news for you: I don't want to use widescreen, and I don't have a choice anyway because I have to use the computer I have, which is on loan from my school.
Anyway, despite the little glitches, it's still a well-crafted joke, probably made in someone's 20% time. Whoever you are, thanks!
Google Blogoscoped has a big list of Google April Fools' Day jokes for 2008, though it includes things like the Google Docs Offline announcement, which I don't think was a joke. After all, Gmail was launched on April 1 and everyone thought Google was kidding. Despite appreciating the humor, I don't think I can trust anything I see today 100%... All this seemed to start a day early, actually, on March 31. April Fools' Day is now two days, apparently.
Musical in the Food Court!
This post digresses from my usual technobabble, but it's just too funny and creative (not to mention awesome!) to pass up.
Improv Everywhere is a New York City-based group of people started in 2001. What they do is usually totally off-the-wall and almost always funny. Their blog's tagline: "We Cause Scenes". The mission I'm featuring today, though, was done in Los Angeles, CA. (There is now a global Improv Everywhere site on Ning as well, but this mission was performed before that was launched.)
I like the idea of Improv Everywhere because I am also into improvisational performance. I don't usually get into the complexity they do, nor do I pull off stunts in public places -- in fact my improv is usually part of some exercise in theater classes. I do like to do things like randomly start singing in the middle of a mall, and that's what their latest mission was.
Posted to ImprovEverywhere.com late last night, "Food Court Musical" has already drawn a ton of comments. The story is, well... Watch the video first.
I don't know who came up with the idea to sing a song about needing some napkins, but this is just too funny. The way it starts with one person and escalates into an entire group is really great.
One of the best parts, I think, is the security guard. He comes in and everyone thinks he's about to break up the performance, when suddenly he starts to sing as well.
The title sounds to me like a cross between the two Disney films High School Musical and Full Court Miracle. It really works, I think. The choreography even reminds me of some stuff from HSM.
As described further on the mission's page, Improv Everywhere actually got permission from the mall to pull off this show. That's something they don't usually do, but in this case it made for a better performance. Having people dressed in the same uniforms as mall personnel and putting one behind the counter of Hot Dog on a Stick definitely made it seem more real. (The other food court businesses had no idea what was going to happen.)
Anyway, I won't lift all the notes from Improv Everywhere's mission page, even if I am rewording it. They deserve traffic for this one, so head on over there for more commentary and the photos.
Before you go, however, I would appreciate a comment here if you like this sort of post, or if you don't. I need feedback so I know what to write more about.
Update (13:28): Reduced embed size; it was too big for the content column. It should no longer overflow into the sidebar.
Funny Randomization: Google: Web 2.0?
Here's a randomization from google.isyournewbicycle.com that is obviously untrue, this time about Google (rather than Microsoft):
That's really funny, considering that Gmail was one of the first major Web applications to use AJAX extensively. Google's Calendar, Reader, and Docs services (among many others) also use AJAX as a fundamental part of their inner workings, so it's even funnier in that case.
Funny Randomization: Microsoft Downgrades Vista
Found a little site called isyournewbicycle.com, which allows you to plug in any word before the domain (such as I did for this with microsoft.isyournewbicycle.com) and get back a randomized phrase. On the third or fourth try, I got this little gem:
Great fit for the company that made the worst operating system I've ever heard of, eh? Just thought it was funny. Any takers? Beg-to-disagree-ers? Hit the comments; I'm waiting to hear from you!
XKCD Feature: Bass
Ever get driven up the wall by annoying cars driving around that play their stereos at top volume with the bass turned all the way up? I know I do. The xkcd webcomic released a great strip the other day that I've been keeping at the top of my starred items in Google Reader (or at least trying to). I finally decided to blog about it.
So, without further ado, here is Randall Munroe's "Bass":
I really wish I could do that to some of the cars I encounter. Maybe he'll lend me that machine now that it's done being sketched for the comic? Hey, I can dream, can't I?
Update (15:57): I forgot to mention my older XKCD Roundup post from last month. Heh, oops.
[Image licensed under CC-BY-2.5, xkcd.com]
Amusing Holiday Greeting
Steve Bass published an interesting, amusing holiday greeting in his latest column, sent in by a reader:
Please accept with no obligation, implied or implicit, my best wishes for an environmentally conscious, socially responsible, low stress, non addictive, gender neutral celebration of the winter solstice holiday, practiced within the most enjoyable traditions of the religious persuasion of your choice, or secular practices of your choice, with respect for the religious/secular persuasion and/or traditions of others, or their choice not to practice religious or secular traditions at all. I also wish you a fiscally successful, personally fulfilling and medically uncomplicated recognition of the onset of the generally accepted calendar year 2008, but not without due respect for the calendars of choice of other cultures whose contributions to society have helped make America great. Not to imply that America is necessarily greater than any other country nor the only America in the Western Hemisphere. Also, this wish is made without regard to the race, creed, color, age, physical ability, religious faith or sexual preference of the recipient of said wish.
By accepting these greetings, you are accepting the aforementioned terms as stated. This greeting is not subject to clarification or withdrawal. It is freely transferable with no alteration to the original greeting. It implies no promise by the wisher to actually implement any of the wishes for herself/himself/others, and is void where prohibited by law and is revocable at the sole discretion of the wisher. This wish is warranted to perform as expected within the usual application of good tidings for a period of one year or until the issuance of a subsequent holiday greeting, whichever comes first, and warranty is limited to replacement of this wish or issuance of a new wish at the sole discretion of the wisher.
Apparently, the author works in a law firm, which would explain the stilted, formal language. I think it just makes it more amusing.













