Yuck! Proprietary USB Cables
Chris Pirillo makes a good point in this video. Before I say anything further, you should watch it:
There, now that you've seen his ire, you can read my reasoning.
Plenty of us know that proprietary anything is usually bad for the consumer. Proprietary data formats force us to use the same program (switching would be a pain -- manual re-entry -- because the software company didn't make a converter or export function). Proprietary procedures mean patents, trademarks, copyrights, or whatever, and mean no two companies will necessarily do things the same way. And proprietary connectors lock in an accessory market, with purchases often costing more than generic products would simply because the company that makes them has you in a death grip.
Now, while Chris's reaction is an emotional one (no doubt inspired by a conversation on his IRC channel), he makes a very, very good point. Proprietary connectors do nothing but irritate the consumer. Finding which USB connector fits which USB device is a nightmare. I'm happy to say that my camera uses a standard Mini USB cable. My iPAQ uses a proprietary connector, but that's because it performs more functions than just charging and synchronizing.
Microsoft and Sony use proprietary connectors for their gaming devices (these are only a couple examples), and as a result, you have to buy their authorized accessories. The prices can be whole factors higher (twice as much or more) than standard cables and connections.
Lego is also a user of proprietary connections. Within its Mindstorms robotics line, the cables used to connect the NXT computer with the various sensors and motors look, at first glance, like ordinary RJ-11 wiring, but the release tabs are pushed to the side, making them incompatible with other devices and standard cables incompatible with Lego's products.
I haven't had to replace any NXT cables yet, but there's a definite boon to companies like Canon (and Olympus; my mom's five-year-old camera also uses a Mini USB plug) using accepted standards. I could use the cable from either camera in the other in a pinch, or buy a standard camera cable at any electronics store should I lose or damage the one that I got in the box. It also means that if I have multiple devices that use the same connector, such as a camera, a phone, a PDA, and an external storage device, I can share one or two cables between all of them, as I'm unlikely to use more than a couple devices at a time.
So you see, standards are a good thing for the consumer. Even if the companies make a little less money, they'll make up for it in consumer happiness.
Thanks for the inspiration, Chris!
Canon Camera Numbering Hack
I finally decided to blog about the little hack I discovered over the summer. My Canon PowerShot SD750 (and all other Canon cameras, as far as I know) numbers files by user preference, either continuously or resetting on each new folder and blank card. I found a way to hack this setting so experimental pictures you don't want to count in your photo total can be re-used. This only works on deleted photos right after your last kept one, so it won't reuse other unused numbers in the sequence.
For example, you keep picture 1343, then take five test pictures and delete them all (1344-1348). By going into the menu, selecting the File Numbering option, and cycling the setting from Continuous to Auto Reset and back, you can make the camera re-use those five numbers. If you previously deleted picture 1245, though, it still stays unused.
This is a good short-term hack, but it can't be used retroactively. You have to do it before you save another picture. If you forget and save picture 1349, in our example, you'll have a five-number gap, and you can't fix that unless you delete photo 1349, as well.
I also discovered a way to get back your numbering if you accidentally reset it by performing this hack on an empty memory card.
Get Back your Canon Camera’s Numbering
I just had the experience recently of trying to reset my Canon PowerShot SD750's numbering back to the last picture I had saved. The little hack I discovered over the summer was that I could go into the menu, cycle File Numbering from Continuous to Auto Reset and back, and any file numbers I'd erased since the last saved picture were re-used. It worked great when I was carrying the whole summer's worth of pictures on the card. With an empty one, though, it reset the numbering back to zero. I wanted my numbers back, so here's how I did it.
I took the memory card out of the camera and put it into my computer's card reader. I opened it in Windows Explorer (any file manager will do) and made a new folder named "100CANON" (the default photo folder name). I went into my photo library and found the latest picture I had taken, a file named "IMG1903.jpg". I loaded it into the new folder and took out the card. I put it back into the camera, cycled the menu option to be safe, and took a picture. Voila! Picture 100-1903 was joined by number 100-1904. I deleted both (a copy of the one I loaded was still on the computer by default). Now the camera's back to where it was.
I don't expect this to be especially useful for a lot of people, but it should work on any Canon camera that uses the same file numbering (is that all of them?). It works because the camera, when numbering files, goes on either the last picture taken (on an empty memory card in Continuous mode) or the highest-numbered file on a non-empty card (in either mode). Copying a file you took with the camera, as far as I can tell, is crucial, because you cannot view photos that have been edited with a computer on the camera. Theoretically, the file could be copied and renamed to "IMG9999.jpg" and set the camera to start over, or "IMG7285.jpg" and set the next picture at 7286. Deceptive numbering like that isn't very good for really determining how many photos you've taken with the camera, but it might be good for playing a prank on someone else's.






